Tag Archives: Movies

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

July 8, 2024

Posted under

Uncategorized

Comments

Leave a comment

Paramount Summer Classic Film Series-The Muppet Movie

You don’t think going to the movie theater is going to be a dangerous enterprise, until you realize at the end of an hour and a half that your face is strained from smiling so frequently and laughing on a regular basis. The soreness of my face is a small price to pay for the joy of “The Muppet Movie”. This delightful piece of Cinema from 1979 brings the Muppet team together for their first motion picture, and keeps all of the characters in line with their personalities and comes up with a storyline to connect them all.

I first saw “The Muppet Movie” at the Cinerama Dome in Hollywood in 1979. I felt about it pretty much then the way I do now, it is a brilliant and clever application of puppetry to movie making and it delivers a heartfelt message to all of the dreamers out there. The biggest dreamer of all of course was Jim Henson, the creator of The Muppets. Henson continues to inspire filmmakers and storytellers, and some of the innovations found in this movie are still around today.

It is possible that there has never been a more personable character than Kermit the Frog. As the leading man in the picture he is both thoughtful and a little fearful as he confronts the world around him in pursuit of his dreams. Kermit’s sincerity is reflected by the circumstances he frequently finds himself in. One of the joys of this movie is the plethora of cameos by actors, comedians, and historical movie people, which populate the background. Bob Hope distributing ice cream, Edgar Bergen judging a small town beauty contest, and Richard Pryor selling balloons are all in this movie together. If you ever get stuck playing Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon, remember that the Muppet Movie will let you connect a whole lot of people if you can just remember everyone who showed up in this movie.

The Paramount Theater was packed with families bringing small children to encounter The Muppets in a format that they probably haven’t seen before. Based on the laughter and applause I heard,  the mayhem created by the Muppets continues to be something that the young and old can share. It’s probably a little nostalgic for people of my generation, but there’s still plenty of things that are funny regardless of the time line. Statler and Waldorf heckling everybody is always funny. I think the joke with Carole Kane reappearing each time somebody uses the word “myth”, and she acts as if they are saying Miss, is still viable. Maybe the Hare Krishna reference will seem a little out of date, since that religious group is not nearly as prominent as it was in the 1970s. I still laughed however at that recurring joke.

I want to embrace Fozzie Bear, bring Gonzo the great home, and attend the wedding of Kermit and Miss Piggy. 5 years later we got a chance to do that, and that 1984 film, “the Muppets Take Manhattan” will hopefully play at the summer film series sometime in the future. I got a kick out of seeing the audience respond to an extremely young Steve Martin, a nearly silent Orson Welles, and Mel Brooks looking young and acting silly playing a Teutonic neurological doctor, who’s going to do a brainectomy on poor Kermit. Geez there are a lot of people in this movie.

In addition to smiling I teared up occasionally, because this was one of the movies that my late wife and I attended together and loved passionately. The Muppets were one of the things that we shared both before and after we were married. When our kids came along we loved the chance to share that with them as well. As far as I’m concerned the world is a lesser place when there isn’t a Muppet Movie on the horizon. Fortunately in 1979 the future would be ripe for these for these characters, and in 2024 we luck out again because they showed up here in the Paramount classic Summer Movie film series.

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

July 6, 2024

Posted under

Uncategorized

Comments

Leave a comment

Paramount Summer Classic Film Series Double Feature

We had a Double Feature at the Paramount Theater last night. Two 1980s era musicals about dancing. Not to put too fine a point on it, the line for the ladies room was extremely long, for the gentlemen, not so much.

Dirty Dancing

I saw this film when it originally came out in 1987 and I remember enjoying it but not particularly embracing it. I think I have seen it once since then, but more that twenty years ago, again, with some appreciation but not necessarily enthusiasm. After last night’s screening however, I think I can say I am a fan. Maybe it was the passage of time, the fact that I was seeing it with my daughter, or simply the audience enthusiasm that became contagious that converted me. This is a very well made movie. It may be a little hokey, but all of that hoke works the way it is supposed to. 

Patrick Swayze and Jennifer Grey are terrific in the movie. He is a dynamic dancer with looks that can make a female audience member swoon, and she is fresh and authentic and has the dramatic chops for the part that she is playing. So what that the story is the well worn plot path of two people from different worlds falling in love. They get to do so against a great soundtrack, with a nostalgia painted background and dance while it happens. 

Jerry Orbach as Baby’s (Grey) Father, manages to create the kind of father figure who remains sympathetic in spite of his opposition to the pairing. His interjection into the story because of a medical emergency seems right, after all he is a doctor, and the confusion about what is happening was understandable. The third person perspective the audience has allows us to identify with all the characters, and also applaud when the indifferent villain of the piece gets his comeuppance, both at the hands of Johnny (Swayze) and Baby’s Dad. 

The audience last night filled the Paramount with cheers, catcalls and swoon filled ahhhs, as Baby and Johnny come together. The humorous courtship through a crash course in mambo dance training was just the ticket for the blossoming romance. Little expressions on the faces of the two lovers, or a gesture from one to another, elicited a tickled response from the audience. I had not remembered how long the dance sequence in the employees quarters was near the start of the story, but it was worth it.   

In spite of a serious abortion subplot, most people will remember this as a light romance with charismatic actors who had great on screen chemistry. I have read that Swayze and Grey had some personal clashes but managed to successfully work together in making the movie. From watching them in the film, it is hard to believe they frequently did not get along. Choose the fantasy. 

The second film had lost nearly a third of the audience but none of the enthusiasm.

Footloose

Although not as well constructed as “Dirty Dancing”, “Footloose” manages to be just as entertaining, with it’s own sense of purpose as well. No doubt there are repressive communities like the one imagined here, but the stereotypes are a little more jarring in comparison to the first movie. This was a star making turn for Kevin Bacon, who is still in demand as an actor, forty years later (He appears in “Maxxxine” which I will be seeing later today).

The dance sequences in “Dirty Dancing” grow out of the story setting, with dancers at a Catskills resort. Here, there have to be invented moments which will allow for some of the dance moves to be demonstrated. The audience approved of the moves in Bacon’s warehouse solo dance scene, although those approving cheers were frequently preceded by laughter at the set up. Regardless, I think I will have to agree with Peter Quill:

Peter Quill:  on my planet, we have a legend about people like you. It’s called Footloose. And in it, a great hero, named Kevin Bacon, teaches an entire city full of people with sticks up their butts that, dancing, well, is the greatest thing there is.

As much as the dancing is about Kevin Bacon, most of the drama is about Lori Singer. I wasn’t convinced by her relationship with Bacon’s Ren, but she does hit the mark with her contentious but still loving relationship with her father played by John Lithgow. Reverend Moore is trying to protect his whole congregation, in an attempt to compensate for the loss of his son, and the pain he feels is balanced by his sincerity. When he snaps and slaps his daughter Ariel, it is a shocking moment that brings uncomfortable realism to an otherwise light weight fantasy film.

The “Footloose” soundtrack is filled with original compositions that were co-written by the screenwriter, Dean Pitchford. He has eight credited songs in the film, songs that he worked on with the likes of Kenny Loggins, Jim Steinman, Sammy Hagar, and Eric Carmen. It has a very different feel than the 60s needle drops of the other film on this double bill. The scene where Ren plays “chicken” on a tractor, gets the over the top Steinman treatment and it is a perfect fit of grandly over the top song with ridiculous scenario. “Let’s Hear it for the Boy” is a comic gem in the spot that it is used. Overall, the audience was thrilled. 

I’m inclined to accept this summary.

Peter Quill: The Avengers?

Thor: The Earth’s mightiest heroes.

Mantis: Like Kevin Bacon?

Thor: He may be on the team. I don’t know, I haven’t been there in a while.

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

July 5, 2024

Posted under

Uncategorized

Comments

Leave a comment

Paramount Summer Classic Film Series-Chinatown

As I am putting this post together I just read that screenwriter Robert Towne passed away Monday night at the age of 89. “Chinatown” is his masterpiece, and it certainly seems fitting that we were seeing it on the big screen at the time he was moving on to his final resting place. This is the second time we’ve seen the film on the big screen this year, having enjoyed it at the TCM Film Festival back in April. This year is the 50th anniversary of Chinatown, and celebrating it with multiple screenings, as well as spending time with the book “The Big Goodbye” which is primarily about the making of the movie, all seems fitting.

The screenplay of course is one of those that manages to get everything pitch perfect. We know from the background on the film that it took long battles and big arguments between screenwriter Robert Towne and director Roman Polanski, to get to the finished product. Ultimately, Towne was unhappy with the ending of the movie, which of course features tragedy rather than redemption for the heroine. I think we’re lucky that Polanski won, because the final line of the movie, which everyone knows, is the perfect coda for what we have seen in the previous 2 hours.

Again we need to credit the great Jerry Goldsmith for coming in at the last minute and replacing the score with a jazz infused time period appropriate combination of horns and piano. The film just wouldn’t work without that set of themes or nerve racking minor key piano notes. It’s also easy to give huge kudos to the production design, which manages to make Los Angeles of the 1970s look like Los Angeles of the 1930s. I imagine that there was some graffiti removed around the Los Angeles River, certainly some traffic controlled on Alameda, and the flood control channels look a heck of a lot more pristine than they probably do today. Let me also say that every piece of clothing worn by either Faye Dunaway or Jack Nicholson, should be available for us to purchase today. I know I could rock that jacket that he’s wearing in the last part of the film. 

We were encouraged by the Paramount to dress up for the occasion, and although I didn’t have an appropriately colored fedora, I did have a black one that worked pretty well. The tie I picked out belong to my uncle Howard, who was actually my father’s uncle, and I have no doubt that he bought it sometime in the 1930s, the style is just too precious. I added some suspenders but most importantly I added a bandage to my nose to complete the picture. I got several compliments from people walking out of the theater, who appreciated a little bit of extra effort. I know I had fun and I know I love this movie.

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

July 5, 2024

Posted under

Uncategorized

Comments

Leave a comment

Paramount Summer Classic Film Series-Who Framed Roger Rabbit?

It’s always a joy seeing animation on the big screen but when it’s combined with live action as effectively as is done in “Who Framed Roger Rabbit?”, it’s an even greater pleasure. This was a groundbreaking film from director Robert Zemeckis who must have twisted some arms, kissed some butt, and prayed to the movie gods to be able to have access to all of the classic cartoon characters that appear at some point or other in the film. It seems almost impossible to believe that Mickey Mouse and Bugs Bunny would share a scene together. But they do and it’s hysterical.

The story builds on a well-known fantasy that there was a deliberate effort by car companies and the oil industry to get rid of the public transportation in Los Angeles. The rate at which the city was growing and the space that it was taking up was never going to be accommodated by the old red line, but the world is full of conspiracy theorists, and this plot takes its cue from that Old Chestnut. The most fantastic conceit in the film is that the characters are film stars who are animated and live in the real world. That means that humans and hippopotamuses are going to bump into one another. It means that that old joke where Bugs Bunny paints a line on the road to move the pursuers into crashing into a wall, can actually happen. And in this film it does.

Bob Hoskins needs more credit for the work that he did in this film. As the human private detective Eddie Valiant, Hoskins has to be handcuffed to animated Rodger Rabbit, have his hair stroked by an animated Jessica Rabbit, shake hands with a variety of cartoon characters that we will recognize from our childhood, and be the butt of some of the gags that we all knew from Saturday morning. He’s terrific in this movie. So many people deserve credit for making the film work but let’s not forget to mention animation director Richard Williams who managed to get animated critters to interact with human beings in a believable way.

There’s so many things to admire about the movie, but I want to start with the opening cartoon which is done in a text Avery Style with characters that feel familiar but are completely original. Baby Herman and Rodger Rabbit dashing through the kitchen avoiding tragedy with every movement, and the toon ending up being targeted by just about every item in the kitchen drawers is just funny. When it breaks at the end because Roger can’t come up with stars to show his concussion, rather than tweeting birds, it’s a Hollywood Insider’s dream.

Everyone should remember that Christopher Lloyd is not just a character actor but was an important star in the 1980s. Of course “Back to the Future”, but also “Star Trek 3″,” The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai across the 8th Dimension”, and this film, where he plays Judge Doom, a cartoon masquerading as a human. His maniacal eyes, somber expression, and creepy voice almost give him away. And when the secret is out, believe me text Avery is applauding somewhere.

The film was playing at the State Theater next door to the Paramount because there was a concert being set up at the bigger venue. We had arranged to meet a couple of friends of ours from the neighborhood in front of the theater, but they were running a little late from some appointments they had on Sunday morning. Ultimately they got into their seats about 20 seconds before the film rolled. It was nice to get a chance to do something with people that we know from the neighborhood. We had a nice lunch afterwards, and Sunday afternoon is a great time for a cartoon and something to fill your belly.

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

July 2, 2024

Posted under

Uncategorized

Comments

1 Comment

Horizon An American Saga Chapter 1 (2024)

I’m a fan of westerns, a genre that doesn’t get much love these days. It’s rare when a Western shows up in a theater, although there seem to be a plethora of them on streaming services. Actor/director Kevin Costner seems to be a fan of westerns also, he made two terrific westerns in the past, one of which won the Academy Award for Best Picture. I have yet to catch up with the various seasons of Yellowstone, and having seen only the first three episodes of the first season I’m not sure how closely it hones to traditional westerns, but from what I saw it sure felt like a contemporary version of some of those old style films.

“Horizon” attempts to do something that is very ambitious, tell a story about the settling of the West, through multiple characters in simultaneous time settings. It also attempts to do this by making the characters complete and the stories unique. As a result of this attention to detail, there is a vast amount of information and story play out. This means that even a 3-hour movie will be insufficient to provide the canvas that screen writer Kevin Costner and his co-authors have come up with. Thus, this movie is only Chapter one. Chapter 2 is complete and will be coming in August, and Chapter 3 is being filled now. It doesn’t look like the films will be making back the money that was invested in them, so I have some doubt about whether the fourth film in in The Saga will be completed. That is neither here nor there though, today we are talking about the first film.

From my point of view “Horizon” is managing to do something that is terrific, giving us an engaging story with a multiplicity of plot lines that all managed to engage us but in completely different ways. Some of the stories involve a mystery, that will certainly be explained as we go along. Some of the stories are a bit of a quest, mostly with characters seeking vengeance, or defying the inevitable wave of immigrants seeking a home in the West. It also looks like we are going to get some love stories, a little bit of political intrigue, and definitely more gunfights.

This first chapter opens quietly with a few souls trying to survey property that they hope to turn into a homestead. Then later, as a larger group has assembled in this particular spot, there is a massive Indian raid and and dozens of homesteaders are killed, and the animosity between the Apache’s and the new immigrants is set up. Sienna Miller plays a woman whose family is decimated in the attack, and with her preteen daughter, she seeks security and safety with a troop of Calvary men not too far from where the massacre took place. Sam Worthington is the lieutenant who back ends into managing the aftermath of the Indian Massacre, he also looks to be a potential romantic partner for the newly widowed Miller.

It takes more than an hour before Kevin Costner’s character appears on screen, but the roots of the conflict that he’s going to become involved in were set up early in that first hour with the character played by Jenna Malone. It actually becomes quite complicated, because it is uncertain what Malone’s character has done, and why. Let’s just say that a toddler, a lady of the evening, and a saddle tramp are about to be connected in a very unusual way. Meanwhile we are also introduced to a wagon train filled with immigrants headed toward Horizon, which is the name of the future town that they hope to establish. They will be facing cultural disputes, personal antagonisms, along with water shortages and hostile indigenous people.

We are not seeing this story merely from the perspective of the new immigrants however. The Native Americans are having their point of view illustrated on screen as well. There is no unanimity among the natives as to how the indigenous peoples want to confront the newcomers. The oldest chief, seems ready to cave to the inevitable tide of white men coming into his territory. Two of his sons and the band of followers however have a vastly different approach to the influx of a new population.

The film looks spectacular, it was shot in Utah which has some of the most beautiful landscapes in the West. Director Costner is taking full advantage of the diversity of physical settings that are available in these locations. His character Hayes Ellison, is traveling through these vistas, accompanied by a temporary family, and pursued by another family who are out for vengeance. You can see the tension building in all of the stories, but you will not find a complete plot in this movie. It literally is a single chapter in a much larger tome.

It looks like the general critical word on this movie has been negative, but that’s the polar opposite of my view. This is going to be one of the finest films of the year, and it has more ambition, interest, and compelling characters than any of the other films that I’ve been seeing this year. Although the movie is 3 hours long, it flies by because some of the action scenes are so compelling that you don’t realize how much time has gone by. We never stay too long with one story, before another story starts playing out its events, and then we’re on to the next story before you know it. As we come back to each set of characters we have an expectation that something new is going to take place, and it is usually enough to keep us wanting more.

Admittedly director Costner has cribbed substantially from The Works of John Ford, but if you’re going to steal from someone it makes sense to steal from the best. Long live the Western, I can’t wait for chapter 2 in August.

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

June 26, 2024

Posted under

Uncategorized

Comments

1 Comment

Paramount Summer Classic Film Series-Star Tek II: The Wrath of Khan

Once again we are back at the Paramount for another Summer Classic film. This time it was the first film of this season in the “Robert Rodriguez Presents Series”, “Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan”. Local hero Director Robert Rodriguez chooses films that he was inspired by or has some connection to and then introduces them with behind the scenes stories and tidbits about the actors. The villain in this film was played by Ricardo Montalban, who made a couple of the “Spy Kids” movies with Rodriguez. The director noted how the question always comes up about Ricardo’s physique and whether he wore a prosthetic chest piece. That is in fact Montalban’s own chest, and the costume designer was so impressed with his appearance, they created costumes that accentuated his look.

Director Rodriguez also recounted the sad history of Montalban’s back injury and the surgery years later that confined him to a wheelchair. Of course movie magic allowed the actor to run in one of the “Spy Kids” films and that was a nice moment that he shared with us. The director has a long list of notes in a notebook that he refers to as he prowls the stage like a tiger, not from anxiety but rather enthusiasm. He surveyed the audience and found one person who saw Star Trek II when it opened, at the same theater he had done so back in San Antonio in 1982. That audience member was presented with a nice picture book about the making of the movie. I suspect it was also autographed by our host.

“The Wrath of Khan” was a follow up to “Star Trek the Motion Picture”, which was financially profitable but at a huge cost. The sequel was done with a miniscule budget in comparison, and the production was taken over by the TV unit of Paramount to hold down costs. Still, there are several great production moments in the movie, including the battles between the two starships and the Genesis Project video. There are several spots where shots are cribbed from the first movie but it is not egregious. The fact that “Khan” was a continuation of an original series episode was discussed and Rodriguez had edited together a ten minute version of the episode for us to watch before the movie.

You can read my thoughts on the movie here, and  here, and here. This is a movie that I adore and every chance to see it on the big screen should be jumped at. There are two things I would like to add about the screening. Robert Rodriguez explained that another way to save costs was by skipping the more expensive Jerry Goldsmith as the film composer and hiring James Horner. The future Academy Award winning composer was the go to Roger Corman and Star Trek II was his big break. Ironically, Director Nicolas Myer said he was hired because they could not afford Goldsmith, but when Meyer returned to the series for Star Trek VI, they could no longer afford Horner.

The other thing I wanted to mention was the beautiful artwork done by Bob Peak. The prolific film poster illustrator did images for all of the original cast movies, but his work on Trek II was superb. So good in fact, that I draped myself in it for the Sunday night show. 

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

June 21, 2024

Posted under

Uncategorized

Comments

Leave a comment

X (2022) Re-visit

It is no secret that the Ti West film “X” was my favorite movie of 2022. Along with the immediate prequel “Pearl” director west has created an indelible set of characters, tied together by sexuality and a desire for fame. In two weeks we will be getting the next chapter in this franchise, “Maxxxine”, and it is my most anticipated fil of the year. I am always happy to see a movie that I love on the big screen, but this week’s screening was special because at the conclusion of the film, we get the five minute opening of “Maxxxine” as a dessert. The amazing Mia Goth, should have been nominated for an Academy Award for the tremendous work she did in “Pearl”, and it looks like there will be more of that caliber work in the new film. The tone of the clip we saw was perfect, and the exit line that leads to the titles, tells us that this character is a force to be reconned with. I can hardly wait.

As for “X”, this movie continues to impress me with it’s verisimilitude of the late 1970s film scene. The rag tag band of pornographers runs into a older couple that has a dark history and a misanthropic perspective of the world. The movie provides a variety of horror thrills, from slashers, to animal attacks and body horror. That it does so with a great sense of style and humor is what makes the film so memorable. The aforementioned Mia Goth has a dual role in the film, and she hits the right marks of both a scream queen and a horror villain. 

The obvious horror influences are “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” and “Psycho”. The setting at an isolated farm in Texas with a weird family of residents is supplemented by the group arriving in a van, and going through some of the same stages of travel as were found in that 1974 classic. The “Psycho” connections are slightly more subtle but also more plentiful. There is an infirm old lady, watching from an upstairs window. Voyeurism is at the heart of the story as we peek at the sex being filmed for a low budget porno, the main antagonist does some peeking as well. “Psycho” gets name checked by the film student/director of the movie within the movie, and he has a shower scene that anticipates the Janet Leigh treatment he receives just a few moments later. The stud film star, who is acting sympathetically to the old man in the story, gets the Martin Balsam treatment. 

In an early scene in the movie, we are treated to a Peeping Tom’s overhead view of Maxxine taking a nude swim. Included in the overhead shot is an encroaching crocodile, which is disappointed at the last minute, but Director Ti West knows that Chekov’s crocodile must play a part in the mayhem, and he does not disappoint. Brittany Snow plays the cocksure actress who can both make it and fake it. Martin Henderson as the ambitious film producer manages to be slimy but also somewhat charming and polite. Jenna Ortega was in her third horror fil of the first half of the year when she gets tempted to the dark side of sexual fame. Her hysterics in the final act are one of the things that make the climax feel so much like “Texas Chainsaw Massacre”. 

Although there is gore a plenty in the film, the sense of terror does not rely on those bloody images. Two example perfectly explain what I am talking about. Wayne, the producer has a encounter with a rusty nail that invokes more horror than his final confrontation with a pitchfork. Ti West knows how to milk that suspense, and when the sudden puncture away from the foot happens, it is almost a relief and comic by comparison. The second scene that shows off the horror bona fides of the director comes when Mia Goth encounters Mia Goth in her bed. It is as disturbing as is possible while also having some sympathy for the horrible Pearl. 

I hate that I have to wait an extra day to see “Maxxine”, we have some other commitments. I guess being an adult carries the weight of responsibility with it. Although I have to say, loving these movies may undermine all that I do in the rest of my life to prove I am a grown up. 

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

June 19, 2024

Posted under

Uncategorized

Comments

1 Comment

Paramount Summer Classic Film Series-Alice in Wonderland

Another packed family movie, although this one was presented under the “Banned Camp” label that the film series is using this summer. Steven Janise, the programmer spoke at the start of the show, pointing out that the original book of “Alice in Wonderland” appeared on some lists of books banned by schools or libraries. It was not more specific than that so I can’t tell you why.

The film experienced a renaissance in the late sixties when the drug counter-culture embraced all of the weird elements of the movie, and if you watch the movie, you will see why. This film is loaded with characters right out of a dream or a nightmare. The background flora and fauna are terrifically designed and would hold up in a contemporary film even if the form of animation was different. 

“Alice in Wonderland” does not really have a structure. The main character of young Alice, simply wanders through the enchanted world, encountering odd stories and characters along the way. Although nominally chasing the white rabbit, there was no real purpose for doing so, and if she spends ten minutes listening to a story or song, it is perfectly acceptable because all that happens next is another story or song .The Walrus and the Carpenter is a little creepy, since the adorable baby oysters get eaten, but at least it happens off screen. The Queen of Hearts is a little shrill too often for my taste but the game of croquet was a lot of fun.

The Cheshire Cat and the Caterpillar are exactly the things that hippies smoking pot or dropping acid would relate to. They are surreal moments in an abstract kind of film  that feels very ahead of itself, until you hear the songs. The songs are all standard child friendly 50s fare that have no hooks but are not unpleasant. 

Lush backgrounds, fluid characters and amazing designs are the reason you want to see this movie. It is a lot of fun at times, but it does get a little tiresome with the story pattern repetition.  

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

June 14, 2024

Posted under

Uncategorized

Comments

Leave a comment

Paramount Summer Classic Film Series -The Bride of Frankenstein and Dracula’s Daughter

Midweek we enjoyed a double feature of horror films from the 1930s. The classic “Bride of Frankenstein”, and the lesser known but very stylish “Dracula’s Daughter”. It’s been less than 18 months since I saw the Bride of Frankenstein in a theater. Back in 2022 I saw The Bride with “The Mummy” in a Fathom event and I wrote about it then and you can read about it here.

The “Bride of Frankenstein” is one of the most stylish films from the 1930s. Filled with what might be described as German expressionism, the lighting and shadows are dramatic and exactly the kind of thing that foreshadows film noir coming in the next decade. Of course there are also the over-the-top performances of Dr Frankenstein and Doctor Septimus Pretorius. The one actor who clearly outshines everyone in the film continues to be Boris Karloff. Although he was against it, this version of the monster developed some language skills, and it helps the story take on some even greater moral dilemmas.

Where is Henry Frankenstein stitched together body parts of the Dead and used electricity to try and bring them back to life, Dr. Pretorius seems to have been using recombinant DNA to achieve his goal, and this is well before the concept of DNA was understood. He appears to have been using cloning and some kind of genetic Magic to produce his set of miniature living beings. That sequence is mostly used for humor, but it does set up the idea that they’re going to grow a body around a bone structure as opposed to trying to assemble one from body parts of others. Of course the one exception as they get close to creating the bride, comes when they have to have a fresh heart. Now we’re not dealing with grave robbers but murderers.

The Bride of Frankenstein does continue to raise the question of man’s control over life and death, and whether we are crossing a Rubicon by trying to create life. The film is all the better for the prologue that features Byron and Shelly and Mary  Wollstonecraft Shelly telling the stories on a dark and stormy night. Byron in particular is portrayed as a romantic in a very theatrical way, which sets up the rest of the story very effectively.

“The Bride of Frankenstein” relies on a variety of special photographic effects, miniatures, and production design that creates a Gothic image in a faraway place to give us the creeps. “Dracula’s Daughter” is much more sparse in its use of any special effects. They are one or two moments where the process of hypnosis is visualized using some photographic techniques, but when they get to Dracula’s castle it’s a very basic sequence that is not drawing attention to itself the way the exploding Laboratory at the end of the “Bride of Frankenstein” was doing.

I know I saw this movie two or three times as a kid, but I remembered only a few particular moments. I remembered the ring the Countess Zeleska uses to hypnotize and subdue her victims. I remembered the creepy familiar, Sandor, with his pasty face greased down hair and deep set eyes. He looked like a vampire well before being given eternal life. I also remembered the sequence where the Countess is testing herself with a girl she acquires as a model. When the young woman takes off her blouse and drops down the straps on her chemise, there is a moment of desire that overcomes the Countess,  and that largely accounts for the films Sapphic reputation. 

The film is atmospheric and has some nice visuals, but it feels like a very straightforward drama with a few horror elements added. The opening and closing of the coffin at the count is sleeps in, and the wrap that she cloaks herself in, revealing only her eyes are as close to transforming into a bat or revealing fangs that we are going to get. We never even see the puncture wounds that doctors refer to on the victims. So everything is played very subtly. Of course that’s part of the story The Countess thinks now that Count Dracula is gone, that the spell she is under is broken and it is only her mental state that forces her into continuing to live the nocturnal vampire existence. Thus her interest in the mealy mouth psychiatrist/doctor that she begins to consult and ultimately decides that she wishes to make her Eternal mate.

I had completely forgotten that Van Helsing appears in the film, and that the reason the doctor is involved in the story in the first place is to help his former mentor escape conviction for murdering Count Dracula. The chief of Scotland Yard is portrayed as barely competent, and completely skeptical, but surprisingly accommodating to both Van Helsing and his young former pupil.

There are no big action scenes, we don’t get a stake through the heart, at least not on screen. The Countess is betrayed by her familiar rather than the hero. And the vampire doesn’t melt in the sunlight at the last minute. The movie ends with very little in the way of dramatic climax, and although we’re supposed to have some sympathy for countess Zaleska, we’re mostly left with a feeling of sadness for everybody involved. For a movie with very limited horror effects it manages to have the desired outcome on our emotions. A a very worthwhile sequel to the original Dracula.

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

June 13, 2024

Posted under

Uncategorized

Comments

Leave a comment

Paramount Summer Classic Film Series-The Sting

So in the last 2 weeks we have been able to see three of the Best Picture winners from the mid-70s. A week and a half ago it was “Godfather Part 2”, two nights ago it was “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest”, and last night was our chance to see “The Sting” the film that won the award between the other two. I’ve seen “The Sting” on the big screen several times, and it is always a pleasure. But seeing it with a full audience adds an extra dimension. Let me explain why.

When the auditorium is packed you can hear the reaction of other audience members around you. I could tell from the gasps and laughter of people sitting behind me and down a few rows, that they were seeing “The Sting” for the very first time. Those who are familiar with the movie are aware that there are several surprise twists in various spots in the film, but most especially in the last Act. It is a complete delight to listen to people who are surprised and amused at the twist that shows up next. Another one of the reasons that seeing a film with an audience on the big screen is so important to me.

The event had some special extras to go with it, in addition to our usual popcorn, a drink coupon was provided for us. We also had a selection of Halloween sized candy that we could pick up before we went into the theater. That stop also gave us a chance to wave at and say hi to Danielle who we had met the week before. Erin, the community outreach member that we met last year, greeted us as we were getting our popcorn. She also shared that our picture was used in the latest email to all of the film fans who signed up for Paramount notifications. That was cool.

Before the film started, a series of screen slides provided some trivia information about the making of the film. Included was a detail that Jack Nicholson had been offered the role of Hooker, ultimately played by Robert Redford. Yeah, I think this was a good outcome, having Jack in the part would have been a completely different kind of movie. The biggest draw for me has always been the outsized villain played by Robert Shaw.  is Doyle Lonnegan is a joyless mobster who simply cares only for money and being the top dog. Any action that undermines his pride becomes a motivation for him to seek revenge. That’s why the poker game on the train is so important. It provides all the incentive that Lonnegan needs in order to accept a chance at getting back at Newman’s character. It allows the subterfuge to go undetected because of his desire for revenge. Shaw plays the part with barely a single smile in any of his scenes. Once in awhile a small smirk appears to indicate to Hooker or to Loneaggan’s lackeys that he has the upper hand. It’s a joy to see that smirk it wiped off of his face two or three times in the course of the movie.

Director George Roy Hill won the Academy Award for this particular film, and although he is a respected technician, you don’t hear many people speak of him with the same degree of awe as Scorsese, Coppola, or Spielberg. He did some amazing films in the ’70s and later on this summer we get a chance to revisit the movie that he made with Paul Newman and Robert Redford prior to this, “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid”. I recently saw the film “A Little Romance”, which he made with Lawrence Olivier and a very young Diane Lane, and it’s absolutely terrific. Combine that with the fact that he made the greatest sports movie ever, “Slap Shot”, and turned my favorite book into a fairly reasonable film version, “The World According to Garp”, and I feel he deserves a little more cache with film fans.

It’s not even the middle of June yet, and I feel like I’ve had a summers worth of great movies already. I’m looking forward to several things in the next few weeks, and you can expect continued updates on the Paramount classic film series 50th anniversary.